|
|
Post by Mike(FWF P1MPS) on Jan 20, 2010 6:27:07 GMT -6
Just throwing it out there. Have you guys ever thought about going to a 3 4 team divisions? You play everyone in your division twice and everyone outside your division once, with the exception of one team..  |
|
|
|
Post by Peter (Swamp Dragons) on Jan 20, 2010 7:35:52 GMT -6
My money league was that way. The only difference was in week 11 we had a double header. I wasn't a big fan of that because if you had a bad week it could really knock you out of any chance of the playoffs. I wouldn't mind not playing one team a season, knowing I was going to kick their ass the next! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2010 22:18:18 GMT -6
I'm cool with the option for a double header or 2. Who cares if you have a bad week that week. Any double headers would of course take place during a non-bye-week week, so all teams could be at full strength. One double header is not bad at all, it is when you start having 3 or more that concerns about bad weeks become reasonable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris (RI Irish) on Jan 24, 2010 23:00:15 GMT -6
I still have no desire for 3 divisions. Again,Brad and I set up this league to be different from other leagues.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike(FWF P1MPS) on Jan 25, 2010 17:57:10 GMT -6
Cool...Im good with whatever
|
|
|
|
Post by Gregg(Seal Fuckers) on Jan 25, 2010 22:34:45 GMT -6
can we atleast work out a roation on who we play from the other divison, i belive there are still people i have yet to play
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris (RI Irish) on Jan 26, 2010 13:29:36 GMT -6
and I believe you are wrong Gregg. You should have played all 6 teams from the other conference now. 3 the first year and 3 last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Neil (OC Outlaws) on Jan 26, 2010 22:21:53 GMT -6
and I believe you are wrong Gregg. You should have played all 6 teams from the other conference now. 3 the first year and 3 last year. Actually, Greg is correct. I played the same schedule two years in a row. That is one of the major reasons I suggested shaking up the divisions every year. The other was to promote uninhibited trading. Renegades and Undertow were very reluctant to trade with one another because they were/are in the same division. |
|
|
|
Post by Bill (Fog City Force) on Jan 27, 2010 12:33:11 GMT -6
I also just went back to the ESPN site and compared the 2008 schedule to the 2009, and confirmed that we played the exact same teams on the exact same weeks both season. I agree that we should sort that out, especially given the fact that it now seems the NFL teams excercise the same bye weeks each year, so in week # 8 when 60% of my players are on bye week, I play Detroit, who may be closer to full strength. IMO that would be fine one year, but not something that I would like to see happen every year. (For the record, I still beat his ass this year in week # 8  |
|
|
|
Post by Bill (Fog City Force) on Jan 27, 2010 12:41:44 GMT -6
Uless LM wants to manually set a schedule each year (which would involve going back through history to set the match ups for the current year), I think it may be easier to mix up the way we do the divisions. I know the idea was to be different, how about this: (4) divisions of 3, you play each division once (3 divisions x 3 teams/division) = 9 games + your own division 2 times (2 teams x 2 times) = 4 games This equals the 13 weeks of regular season, you could randomly draw positions each year to place into the divisions to prevent the unwillingness to trade with certain teams as Neil pointed out. That way the only work LM has to do is run the teams through a randomizer to select who is in which division?? Just a thought, I know as commish in several leagues myself, having to manually adjust things is a real pain in the ass!  Thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by Chris (RI Irish) on Jan 27, 2010 13:31:28 GMT -6
I know that we were suppose to play the other 3 teams this year. Must of been an oversite by Brad. How bout we do 6 divisions with 2 teams each?
|
|
|
|
Post by Gregg(Seal Fuckers) on Jan 27, 2010 19:38:18 GMT -6
I know that we were suppose to play the other 3 teams this year. Must of been an oversite by Brad. How bout we do 6 divisions with 2 teams each? your wrong chris  |
|
|
|
Post by Peter (Swamp Dragons) on Jan 28, 2010 6:08:37 GMT -6
I know that we were suppose to play the other 3 teams this year. Must of been an oversite by Brad. How bout we do 6 divisions with 2 teams each? YEAH!!! Then I might have a chance to win the division!!  |
|
|
|
Post by Brad (Texas Hellfire) on Jan 28, 2010 22:00:21 GMT -6
My bad, I was supposed to switch the matchups this year. You should play everyone in the league every two years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2010 22:14:55 GMT -6
and I believe you are wrong Gregg. You should have played all 6 teams from the other conference now. 3 the first year and 3 last year. Actually, Greg is correct. I played the same schedule two years in a row. No wonder my team has sucked so bad. I had the same schedule two years in a row! LOL In all seriousness, I'm down with anything that doesn't involve double-headers. |
|
